During Michael Carrick's tenure as Manchester United manager, the club has topped one statistic, and it is arguably the most important one — since he took charge in January, no team has collected more points than Manchester United. However, over the past 13 years, Manchester United have been more accustomed to leading the transfer spending charts. Now, at least in the eyes of those obsessed with transfer windows, Manchester United may have fallen into another kind of mid-table mediocrity.
According to Transfermarkt data, when the transfer window closed, Manchester United's spending stood at £148 million, potentially rising to £155 million with add-ons. All of it was used to sign midfield players, with no other senior first-team additions. In comparison, Manchester City spent more than £400 million, Chelsea and Tottenham spent more than £300 million, while Newcastle United, Aston Villa, Liverpool and Arsenal all exceeded £200 million. Manchester United ranked 11th, behind promoted sides Ipswich Town and Hull City.

Questions Raised Over Recruitment Strategy
Is this a cost-cutting approach in the style of Old Trafford? Carrick is not someone who criticises the club. He has stressed that he is pleased with the players the team has brought in. It is widely believed that Manchester United needed a left-back and a striker, but those positions were ultimately not addressed. Does this mean the issue lies with the deals that were not completed? Carrick hinted at this.
“Of course, we are very happy with the players we have brought into the team,” Carrick said. “I think we have made some very good deals in terms of the quality and level of the players. You can always look back and think about other things you could have done or might have done.”
There is a feeling that Manchester United were unable to complete those deals — at least when it came to high-level targets. On deadline day, Manchester United had an opportunity to sign Rayan Ait-Nouri on loan. They……