The result was simple: 1-0. Odegaard struck from distance in the 75th minute, with the ball hitting the inside of the post before going into the net and sending the stadium into celebration. But what drew more attention than the goal itself was Arsenal's forwards repeatedly missing opportunities throughout the match. Looking only at the scoreline, it seemed like an easy win; watching the full match showed a much tougher contest.

With 58% possession and 26 shots, the statistics looked like those of a dominant performance. However, the reality was that only a few of those 26 attempts truly threatened the goal. Arsenal pinned Napoli back but struggled to turn their advantage into goals. It was another case of controlling the game without finding the finishing touch.
The deadlock was finally broken in the 75th minute. Substitute Trossard received the ball with his back to goal near the edge of the penalty area and laid it back for the advancing Odegaard. The Norwegian captain struck first time with his left foot, sending the ball on a beautiful curve into the inside of the post and the net. The strike was not only the winner of the match but also Odegaard's first Champions League goal in more than a year.
The goal made Odegaard the undisputed player of the match, and his six key passes highlighted his influence. But the question remained: without that long-range strike, would Arsenal have taken points from this game? That was the issue worth considering.
The scale of Arsenal's missed chances was clear. In the 45th minute, Odegaard played a precise through ball that gave Saka a great one-on-one opportunity from a half-breakaway position. It should have been a chance to extend the lead, but his shot went over the bar. A major opportunity was wasted.
The missed chances continued in the second half. In the 50th minute, Odegaard delivered a chipped pass, Ben White headed the ball across, and Kiwior attempted a close-range finish in front of goal, but the shot went high. It was not saved by the goalkeeper and did not hit the frame of the goal; he simply missed the target.
In the 85th minute, Arsenal launched a quick counterattack and Madueke found himself through on goal. This time he did not miss the target, but the goalkeeper made an excellent save. A one-on-one chance being stopped is understandable, but the earlier missed opportunities kept the match uncertain.
The disappointment continued in stoppage time when Havertz's follow-up finish was ruled offside after a VAR review. Arsenal's substitutes collapsed to the ground in frustration, as another excellent chance had gone begging.
After the match, Arteta gave a measured assessment: "We created many chances, but unfortunately we missed too many clear opportunities. On any other normal day, the score would have been very different." His comments reflected the team's frustration with their attacking efficiency.
Arteta specifically praised Odegaard: "He is changing games directly with goals, stepping up at key moments, and that is exactly what we expect from our attacking players." The remark also suggested that, aside from Odegaard, the other attackers did not make the desired impact on the day.
Arsenal's forwards clearly possess technical ability, but the issue may lie in their mentality and the impatience caused by wanting to prove themselves. When chances arrive, the pressure they feel may be affecting their finishing.
Considering the investment made in the transfer market, Arteta spent significantly during the summer. But if the forwards' finishing ability does not improve substantially, those investments may not fully produce results. The Champions League never lacks opportunities; it tests teams' ability to take them. A 1-0 win over Napoli sounds positive, but the scoreline also involved some fortune.
Of course, one match should not define the entire season. Arsenal taking three points away from home in the Champions League is itself a sign of progress. There is still a long road ahead, and if Odegaard maintains this form while the forwards improve their efficiency, this Arsenal side remains worth watching.
However, for Arsenal supporters, the focus in the next Champions League home match may not only be on "who can score" but also on "who can avoid wasting chances again." That question may be even more important than scoring itself.