Home> Football News > AFC Champions League Prize Money Review: Shanghai Shenhua Lead Chinese Super League Teams as Revenue Gap Widens >

AFC Champions League Prize Money Review: Shanghai Shenhua Lead Chinese Super League Teams as Revenue Gap Widens

NeNaZavode
NeNaZavode
23/08/2026 06:02:51 NeNaZavode

With the new AFC Champions League season approaching, data organizations have reviewed the final prize money earned by participating teams from last season's competition. The statistics show clear differences in tournament revenue among clubs from different Asian leagues, with West Asian teams leading and several Japanese teams also ranking near the top. The prize money figures of Chinese Super League participants reflect the competitive performance of domestic clubs in the AFC Champions League.

AFC Champions League Prize Money Review: Shanghai Shenhua Lead Chinese Super League Teams as Revenue Gap Widens

In the overall prize money rankings, West Asian teams showed strong competitiveness. Saudi club Al Ahli ranked first with total prize money of more than $12.35 million after their performance in last season's AFC Champions League, far ahead of other participants. The earnings came from their results and progress through the tournament, highlighting the returns from major investment by West Asian clubs and making them the highest prize-money winner of the season.

AFC Champions League Prize Money Review: Shanghai Shenhua Lead Chinese Super League Teams as Revenue Gap Widens

Japanese teams followed closely behind and formed a major part of the AFC Champions League prize money rankings. Multiple J League clubs earned substantial tournament income, with overall earnings exceeding those of other East Asian leagues from China and South Korea. Their results were supported by a mature league system, stable tactical approaches and strong youth development foundations. Consistent group-stage performances and frequent advances to the knockout rounds allowed them to collect more prize money. In comparison, many Asian teams still lack the same level of long-term consistency.

Compared with the strong performances of teams from Japan, South Korea and West Asia, the prize money levels of the four Chinese Super League participants were generally lower, with notable differences among them. This reflected the insufficient competitiveness of Chinese clubs in the AFC Champions League. According to the statistics, the four Chinese Super League teams that competed last season showed clear differences in their prize money rankings.

AFC Champions League Prize Money Review: Shanghai Shenhua Lead Chinese Super League Teams as Revenue Gap Widens

Shanghai Shenhua became the highest-earning Chinese Super League team in last season's AFC Champions League with total prize money of $900,000. The result came from their consistent performances, with effective group-stage wins helping them secure additional rewards and deliver the best AFC Champions League result among Chinese Super League teams. Chengdu Rongcheng followed in second place with $888,500 in prize money. As a first-time participant, Chengdu Rongcheng attracted attention with its performance on the AFC Champions League stage and demonstrated the potential of a new generation of Chinese Super League teams.

Shanghai Port had a relatively ordinary campaign, earning only the basic participation prize of $800,000 and failing to receive additional performance-based rewards. Beijing Guoan ranked last among the four Chinese Super League participants with total prize money of $332,250, leaving a significant gap compared with the other three teams. Analysis of the four clubs' figures shows that Chinese Super League teams generally remained at the million-dollar prize money level, clearly behind West Asian clubs earning tens of millions of dollars and Japanese and South Korean teams with higher revenues.

AFC Champions League Prize Money Review: Shanghai Shenhua Lead Chinese Super League Teams as Revenue Gap Widens

Overall, if Chinese Super League teams hope to narrow the gap with Asia's top clubs, improving their on-field competitiveness is essential. Only through more victories and gradually overcoming advancement barriers can they achieve greater tournament value and financial returns.

Comment (0)
No data
Site map Links
Contact informationContact